A propaganda film by the very talented Alain Resnais.
I wonder, for instance, if Olga Wormser’s script can be tied to David Wurmser’s script?
Wormser and her husband Henri Michel were “historical advisors” for Nuit et brouillard.
“…elle a été conseillère historique”…a historical counselor.
Like Philip Zelikow, perhaps?
Or like Edward Bernays. The father of “public relations”…author of the 1928 book Propaganda.
But I have totally skipped over dear Mr. Wurmser. Nay, Dr. Wurmser. Mr. Dr. We’ll get to Ms. Dr. soon enough.
David Wurmser would seem related in spirit to Olga Wormser.
One of the principal authors of A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
Such language…”the Realm”.
Only neoconservatives would dream up the projection of Israeli terror on neighboring countries (and Palestine) in terms fit for The Legend of Zelda.
But let’s not forget Ms. Dr. David’s wife, Meyrav Wurmser.
Also a Ph.D., she’s a doozy.
Why take this tack?
Because I know too much of Godard.
I know that the greatest film of all time (Histoire(s) du cinema) takes as its focus “the camps”, but also takes issue with history as it has been handed down.
And so let us turn to CODOH.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, CODOH is a “hate group” or some such term.
More terrifying is that, if the SPLC is to be believed, nearly everything is a hate group.
So thanks for nothing, you punks!
(See, now I’m marked too. It’s as easy as that.)
We must remember the yellow stars that the Jews were made to wear during deportation to the camps.
Resnais makes this all very clear.
But Resnais makes a disingenuous oopsy (in the spirit of faux documentarian Robert Flaherty): real color footage of the camps (circa 1955…sappy, but at least with no pretense) is intercut with footage which, in context, seems to be from inside the camps during the war.
Resnais can be slightly forgiven…because (supposedly) no such footage exists.
And so he cobbles together replacement footage.
It would, by necessity, largely be from after the liberation of the camps.
Some is perhaps prewar. Deportation.
Some appears “Hollywood” (i.e. the dramatized becomes real because real footage in this regard is absent).
Even though this film is a classic (a “chestnut”, so to speak), I take issue with the entire thing.
It is not a good film.
The film is neither less vague nor less misleading than my review.
I am vague only because I cannot tell you the exact Hollywood movie.
I cannot tell you exactly what Chris Marker did as an assistant director (though he be naturally drawn to still images [of which several figure prominently within]).
But I can tell you about a very strange and potentially important article on CODOH (that would be, Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust).
It is by a “Franco-British…holocaust denier” named Robert Faurisson (as if that is his profession).
“Hi, my name is Robert. Oh, what do I do for a living? Well, a little of this and a little of that. My real bread and butter is in my capacity as a professional holocaust denier, but I also make some dough on the side as an Egyptologist.”
Main point…being “Franco-” (French), his work would be banned in his home country. Yes, denying the Holocaust (which is not at all what he does) is a crime in France. Also in Switzerland too, I think. Surely in Germany, yes?
[N.B. Holocaust denial is illegal in 14 of the 28 EU member countries…plus Switzerland…and, of course, Israel. What a disgusting misuse of police power.]
Why criminalize a thought or opinion?
Because “denying” something as horrible as the Holocaust is somehow evil. However, in today’s legalistic nightmare world, “denial” IS (among other things) a river in Africa.
Denial could be anything.
Five million Jews died instead of six million? Holocaust denier!
Seven million Jews died? Ok, we’ll give you a pass…because you have the right spirit. But remember: 6 million. Six, ok? Six!
And so Faurisson, a very articulate man, tipped many sacred cows in 1980 with his piece “The ‘Problem of the Gas Chambers'” (published in the Journal of Historical Review).
It might be said that Faurisson was the James Tracy of his time. For me, James Tracy is an American hero.
Faurisson, born in England, was an important part of French society and academia until a witch hunt occasioned by the repugnant Gayssot Act (Loi Gayssot).
Faurisson has his doctorate from the Sorbonne. He taught there and in Lyon for 21 years at the collegiate level. But the French are all anti-Semites, right? Dreyfus? Zola? Dream on!
Well, my friends…I’m afraid the “problem with the gas chambers” is also the problem with Resnais’ Nuit et brouillard.
You can judge for yourself here:
Really, that’s what is at issue here. Read and study and judge for yourself.
The Holocaust was an immensely sad event.
But we must know it in detail.
My ignorance is inexcusable.
And, likewise, any misleading, cynical use of ANYONE’S death (from the Holocaust to 9/11) is the worst sin of all: knowingly cashing in…perhaps even for geopolitical chips.
Question what you’ve always known.
Learn everything again for the first time.
Be free to speak.
Be humble, but don’t grovel.
Do your best.
One of the few things I can be proud of in America today…Gayssot thoughtcrime is not quite here.
But Sandy Hook is censored by Amazon.com, Inc. (Nobody Died at Sandy Hook).
9/11 coverage was/is a joke in the USA (Public Enemy was right).
And with kudos to Mike Adams of Natural News for noticing, Amazon still sells Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
For the five Ph.D.s and one J.D./Ph.D. who contributed to Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, I salute you!