Андре́й Рублёв [1966)

What did Brezhnev censor?

Ivan becomes Boriska.

22 minutes cut and two release dates: 1966 and 1971.

Single screening in Moscow: 1966.

Cannes: 1969.

Wins prize.

Censored version: 1971.

Soviet Union.

General release.

Released in the USA in 1973.

Via Colombia Pictures.

Eight.

Quartet for the end of time.

I am your skomorokh.

Perfecting my azure.

The pagans.

Marfa.

There will always be groups who are endangered by the ignorance of the powerful.

Kirov.

Vladimir.

Engels.

Marx.

Yekaterinburg.

Ryazan.

Tyumen.

Rostov.

Tambov.

Tula.

Tver.

Tolyatti.

Yakutsk.

Yaroslavl.

Yoshkar-Ola.

Ulan-Ude.

Ulyanovsk.

Lenin.

Izhevsk.

Irkutsk.

Orenburg.

Oryol.

Omsk.

Tomsk.

Orsk.

Pskov.

Perm.

Ufa.

Kazan.

Penza.

Petrozavodsk.

Petropavlovsk.

Lipetsk.

Kursk.

Khabarovsk.

Makhachkala.

Kaluga.

Beluga.

Kurgan.

Kostroma.

Vologda.

Kemerovo.

Ivanovo.

Krasnoyarsk.

Krasnodar.

Grozny.

Saratov.

Samara.

Smolensk.

Surgut.

Saransk.

Astrakhan.

Arkhangelsk.

Magnitogorksk.

Sterlitamak.

Norilsk.

Murmansk.

Moscow.

St. Petersburg.

Novosibirsk.

Novokuznetsk.

Novorossiysk.

Nizhny Novgorod.

Nizhny Tagil.

Veliky Novgorod.

Belgorod.

Barnaul.

Bryansk.

Bratsk.

Balashikha.

Volgograd.

Voronezh.

Vladivostok.

Vladikavkaz.

Chelyabinsk.

Chita.

Nalchik.

Sochi.

Who killed Zelenko?

What was the pathogen?

What was the means of delivery?

Who killed Senger?

Same group.

In black and white.

Paint looks like shit.

Smeared on the wall.

Irma Raush again with an important character.

I have been a holy fool since you first started tracking me.

A provocation.

Sane, moral, and pious.

Most serial killers are sane.

Q. Anon.

QAnon.

Ezra Cohen-Watnick.

Ezra A. Cohen.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/19/qanon-trump-ezra-cohen-watnick-460520

https://forward.com/fast-forward/368187/did-wife-of-white-house-leaker-ezra-cohen-watnick-work-to-burnish-russias-i/

https://jewishjournal.com/news/united-states/217488/wife-key-trump-aide-worked-make-putins-russia-look-good-west/

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/ezra-cohen-watnick/534615/

https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3914643,00.html

https://www.newsweek.com/2017/04/28/ezra-cohen-watnick-donald-trump-devin-nunes-russia-barack-obama-wiretap-susan-583904.html

IMG_0372

The Atlantic claims that Cohen-Watnick interned for Senator Joe Biden.

Also, apparently Cohen thinks that QAnon is the work of a “foreign state actor” (according to his words in Politico).

IMG_0377

Who said something similar?

Maybe General Flynn??

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10252807/Lin-Wood-Releases-Michael-Flynn-audio-calling-QAnon-CIA-disinformation-plot-total-nonsense.html

By this point it would be a miracle.

A burst of color.

A revelation.

A rainbow.

Return on Roe.

Absolute misery.

Complete deficit of hope.

Reconcile with this bullshit:

https://t.me/EzraACohen

Is this bullshit?

https://qalerts.app/

After this long (and such a magnificent streak of failure), it would appear to be just that.

Consider Basil Fool for Christ.

From whom Saint Basil’s Cathedral takes its name.

Yurodivy.

The vow of silence.

A year and a half of darkness.

Harming a holy fool is bad luck.

And a great sin.

You can’t bullshit a bullshitter.

LARP a LARPer.

LARPing faggot.

To paint diaphanous gowns.

A blue that is almost red.

Iridescent.

And the red offset and balanced by green.

Left and right.

Clapper.

-PD

La Règle du jeu [1939)

I relate to Jean Renoir’s character.  Octave.  Fat, optimistic, and full of regrets.

Jean Renoir was, of course, the director of this film.

Likewise, he plays a very important dramatic role in the production.

I would argue that his role is the most essential of all.

In this film of rich, pithy characters, Octave sticks out like a polished stone.

Not a precious stone.

Simply a smooth, common rock.  A paperweight.  Our anchor.

And this is apparent on first viewing, yet La Règle du jeu necessitates multiple viewings to truly appreciate.

My language is not French.  Yes, perhaps it is my favorite language, but I am indebted to the subtitles.

And La Règle du jeu is replete with overlapping, symbolic dialogue.

But you don’t want to hear such boring play-by-play.

If you are reading, you want something special.

And I want something special when I watch a film.

Jean Renoir (son of the more well-known Impressionist painter Pierre-Auguste Renoir) delivers a masterpiece here.

There is a Great Gatsby effect which may put off modern audiences of modest means (like myself).

To wit, who wants to hear about rich people problems?

All I can do is urge patience when watching this film.

It may not immediately come off as riveting, but it is well worth it if you stick it out till the end.

What should be pointed out is that Renoir was apparently making a statement about the upper classes which paints them in a not altogether flattering light.

More directly, this film takes aim at the elite and lets ’em have it (but in a very sneaky way).

And yet, it is not all about class warfare.

Far from it.

It embraces and repudiates.

Actions can be deplorable.  But those who commit deplorable actions are still humans.

We all have the capacity within us for unspeakable error.

Few among us truly stand out as regards vice.

But we are all touched by the world.

I estimate it quite unlikely than a truly monastic monk or nun is reading this post.

And if they are, I hope they are brewing up a nice batch of beer in Belgium.

The rules of the game.

The beaters.

Hired lackeys who whack the trunks of trees to drive the animal life out of the forest.

Moving like a line of riot police.

All for the rich to have their fun.

The hunt.

But Renoir is the true artist.

He makes it clear.

The rich aren’t all bad.

The poor aren’t all saints.

Both classes lean to the middle.

There are admirable actions from both sides.

Perhaps the class structure itself is suspect.

Perhaps it is a vestige whose time has come.

But reality is that rich and poor will wake up on the globe tomorrow.

Staggered in times.  Zones.

Rich at their leisure (we imagine).

Poor at the more brutal hours (no doubt).

The poor run around like rabbits chased out of the forest.

The rich sit in their hunting blinds and preach gun control.

The true hunt now is the techno hunt.  The bio hunt.

But a girl and a gun can still carry a movie.

And so, I have rambled enough about La Règle du jeu.  It is truly an indispensable film.

Something about it is almost impenetrable for an English speaker (monoglot) in the 21st century.

And so we hope the French haven’t forgotten their fondateurs like Jean Renoir.

Lessons.  Lessons.

It’s up to all of us to preserve these slices of history.

Yes, it is fiction.  Yet, real life was employed (implored) in the making of this fiction (which seeks to be lifelike).

An endless reflection.

In the hall of mirrors at Versailles.

-PD