With film reviews, a critic either reviews the film or reviews themselves. Selves? Self.
Continuing… There are two major modes of writing about art.
If I tell you that film was designated the seventh art by Ricciotto Canudo, am I telling you more about film or more about myself?
I would argue that I am trying to flaunt my intellect.
Every once in awhile my brain serves me well. At other times I am painfully aware of my shortcomings.
And so, Johnny English…not exactly King Lear by Godard.
Nay… ,,but a near piss-perfect spy spoof.
Now there’s an odd turn of phrase. Can’t say I’ve thought of that one in awhile.
Really, it makes little sense…unless…drug test?
It’s certainly not timoxeline barbebutenol. No. I’m assured by my ever faithful companion Wikipedia that that (2) is a fictional drug.
It does, however, share a molecular formula with two actual drugs: amobarbital and pentobarbital (respectively).
Now<> If I followed this particular tangent I would be indirectly commenting on the film at hand.
The ostensible “meaning” would be that this film is so devoid of substance that I had been reduced to concocting literary small talk in its absence.
But that is not the case.
And so in the great literary tradition of the Choose Your Own Adventure books, I shall forego the pharmacological flourish and focus on what’s really important.
Johnny English Reborn, while not a masterpiece in the Palme d’Or sense, smashes both the first two Austin Powers films (and indeed its own predecessor) to infinitesimal bits.
[If I allowed myself the indulgence of an aside involving quantum computing and its version of bits (qubits) I would really be showing my arse.]
Because I don’t know quantum computing from linear regressions. [Figuratively speaking.]
And so I will be plain as day -> I identify with this film
I know. It’s sad in a certain way…
“The Great Pretender”…I sometimes think. I think of Richard Manuel crooning that song with such pain in his heart.
Yes, Levon Helm was right: the moments that Richard took the spotlight for ballads…those were the real highlights.
“Georgia On My Mind”…
A guy with a great big beard. As weird and wistful as Brian Wilson in a giant sandbox.
Uhhh…yes. Where were we?
Reborn no less…
Indeed, a few things are different here.
First we must thank director Oliver Parker.
This film really holds together.
Lucky for him he had Rowan Atkinson in top form as the title character.
But there are two supporting players who deserve special mention.
The first is Daniel Kaluuya.
Mr. Kaluuya, himself of Ugandan ancestry, fills some very big shoes left vacant by his predecessor Ben Miller.
I really did Miller a disservice by failing to mention his fine performance in the first Johnny English film.
But Kaluuya takes a somewhat different tack.
I may be imagining things, but I get the feeling that Kaluuya was playing this role for all it’s worth (like an athlete or musician with a make-or-break chance).
Sure…films employ multiple takes. Drop a line? No problem. Let’s take it again.
And yet, Kaluuya adds a gentle urgency to this farce by way of truly accomplished thespian abilities.
I certainly hope someone in the film world was paying attention as his filmography does not reflect an appreciation for his immense talents.
And finally, I must mention the redemption of Rosamund Pike (reborn, if you will).
I last left her on my site as a rather tragic villain figure in the actual Bond film Die Another Day. Mercifully, she does not exit this film with a volume of Sun Tzu shishkababbed flush to bosom. [What?]
Quite the contrary…for here she is the good guy (girl)…and her acting is as impeccable as her true beauty.
But poor Johnny…poor Rowan Atkinson.
I’ve hardly mentioned him at all.
Must I tell you again what a genius this fellow is?
I haven’t been effusive enough regarding a man whose talents are of the most rare kind.
True, born-to-yuck talents. Born-to-ham. I would only put him in a race with Roberto Benigni.
They are of another era.
Like Peter Sellers.
Like Jacques Tati.
And, of course, back to the fondateur Charlie Chaplin.
The modern world does not embrace this visual sort of humor.
Every once in awhile it reappears. Benigni wins Best Actor.
And then it’s gone again.
Atkinson, dear boy, if you’re out there on the brainwave wavelengths…
You’ve still got it, old chap!
Wow, Pauly, you make every 6-star and 4-star film sound like I gotta watch it right now! I hope you go into advertising. 🙂
Ha 🙂 I wish! I can only dream of being like Cary Grant in North by Northwest. He makes advertising “sexy”. Thank you for your kind comment! –Paul
Bee is right. It’s good because I usually overlook films without high ratings unless I like the director or actor a lot.
I never knew this had a sequel. I would’ve watched it just because it existed, but this review makes me excited for it.
This is an aside on your aside, but I never knew that the book that was stabbed through in Die Another Day was Sun Tzu. What excruciating symbolism.
Yes, the Sun Tzu is presumably an extension of the father/son discussion (the two North Koreans) about only deciding to fight once the battle has already been won.
This is one of the many cultural gaps autodidactism has left me with. I should read Sun Tzu at some point.
I hear you. I find that autodidacts are generally the most educated because they want to learn. You always impress me with the breadth of your knowledge and effort to know about the whole world. It’s no small task.
That’s very kind.