There is an old chestnut of narrative theory…nay, more homespun wisdom…
The phrase “losing the plot”.
It can mean going crazy.
Perhaps that is its primary meaning.
But a very interesting thing happens when one applies the saying literally.
I sense that Twin Peaks was losing the plot around this time.
If you are alerted to such, you will know that the viewership for this show was declining around this time…a few episodes into the second (and final) season [not counting the reboot due soonish].
And it’s easy to see: Season Two started with a bang (eclipsing the previous season’s finale).
Season 2, Episode 1: 19.1 million viewers.
S2, E2: 14.4
S2, E3: 13.7
And Season 2, Episode 4 (that which is under consideration): 12.8
“Tanking” might be a good word for it.
You might also remember (from a cursory search) that some “higher-ups” (ABC?) wanted the great mystery of the show wrapped up or resolved sooner than the show’s authors had wanted it revealed.
No episode during Season One had a viewership lower that 15.6 million.
But barring the bang of Season Two’s opener, the market dropped considerably (and precipitously) for Twin Peaks.
Looking ahead, I can tell you that things got worse before they got better.
Interest continued to wane for several more weeks.
And despite a brief “last stand”, the series’ “numbers” were of a show just creeping across the finish line. [Comparatively speaking.]
This is the thinking of Benjamin Horne (Richard Beymer).
The big pick-up from West Side Story (1961).
But let’s back to this whole authorship thing.
What was David Lynch’s big contribution here?
He cowrote the first three episodes of Season One (with Mark Frost).
From an initial audience of 34.6 million viewers, the count declined to 23.2 and 19.2 in the corresponding weeks (respectively).
Of those same episodes, Lynch directed #s 1 and 3.
Season Two, Episode 1 (facts courtesy of Wikipedia) sees a new distinction in writing between “story” (by Lynch and Frost) and “teleplay” (by Frost alone).
Barring that initial episode of season two, Lynch has no more writing credits up to this point in the series.
Mr. Lynch did, however, direct episodes 1 and 2 of Season 2.
Quantitatively, this seems to indicate that David Lynch was 1.75-out-of-12 responsible for the show’s writing (so far) and 4-out-of-12 responsible for the direction. That’s 14.6% of the writing and 33.3% of the direction. Out of a 200% pie, normalled to 100…
That’s 24%.
Even auteur theory would credit Lynch with only 33% authorship of this series.
Granted, these numbers are for Lynch’s reputed contribution. They are a snapshot of a moment in time.
In total, the original series (of 29 episodes) would include a mere six directed by David Lynch.
That’s an auteur theory contribution number of 20.7%.
Strangely, (barring the first episode of Season Two) David Lynch would not again be credited explicitly with any writing credit whatsoever. Which means 1.75-out-of-29.
6% + 20.7% of a more holistic authorship pie (200%) would leave Lynch at:
about 13.4%.
All of this is to say that auteur theory is more kind to David Lynch with respect to Twin Peaks.
And this episode is so utterly mundane that this was the best review I could manage.
-PD
paulydeathwish 